Monday, March 25, 2019

The Psychohistory Model: A Brief Sketch

Regarding the psychohistory model and the three paradigms of transcendentalism, materialism and magic that I discussed earlier, allow me to explain some of the examples given in this model more closely.

Carroll divides time into aeons, and each aeons into two sub-aeons. Anything before the religious aeon is more or less pre-historical, and so less interesting to consider in a historical discussion such as this one. Suffice to say that in the shamanic aeon, the transcendent is distant, the focus is on the here and now, magic employed for material gain, with little effort invested in living according to some high principle. As the shamanic aeon progresses, the materialist paradigm collapses while the magical paradigm becomes "oppressive" - hegemonic, exaggerated, characterized by more and more superstition and meaningless ritual. Thus we enter the religious era, where the fallacy of magic along with a contempt for the fallen material world creates a yearning for transcendence which is soon realized in the evolving phenomenon of religions of salvation focused on such things as Nirvana, Moksha, a transcendent God, an eternal afterlife.

Such transcendental religious movement initially rely on charisma and magic to attract followers, but soon thereafter magic becomes more and more suspect and more and more prophets and philosophers begin to question the legitimacy of magical thinking and polytheism as such. The Monotheist sub-aeon begins, and the preachers of transcendence now employ reason (the materialistic paradigm is once again starting to rise) to criticize the worship of idols and the performance of divination among other things. The transcendental paradigm has now entered its hegemonic phase and all eyes are focused towards the heavens: God, Truth, the Law, the Good, Salvation, Liberation is all that matters. Intolerance and various forms of millenarianism is greatly strengthened during this period and magic and science (representing the two defeated paradigms) are conflated with one another: the scientist is a magician, the magician is a scientist, and in any case both are suspect.

Next comes the atheist sub-aeon of the rationalist aeon. Matter begins to be redeemed as scientists and philosophers start to believe that the world can actually be improved upon. They are still guided by a clear sense of transcendence - Reason, the Good, Truth, Happiness, Humanity, Progress, Virtue and various other exalted principles, but these principles are no longer removed from the flesh - rather, they are realized in tandem with materialistic improvements. Magic now reaches its ultimate low point: it is unbelievable, incredibly primitive, irrational, a mere proto-science that can now safely discarded in the light of reason. Eventually, during this era, "modernism" arrives in full bloom: socialism, nationalism and liberal imperialism all want to tell the story of human progress, with Humanity or Man or the People as the transcendent subject who will forge destiny according to its will.
After the Second World War, the "grand narratives" were soon questioned (Michel Foucault comes to mind), the transcendent human subject was beginning to be seen as dangerous and therefore necessary to deconstruct. This was accomplished and the transcendentalist paradigm has now suffered a great defeat at the hands of postmodernist philosophy. The final nail in the coffin of the "atheist" sub-aeon was, I believe, the collapse of the USSR and the dream of socialism. Picture the difference between the world before and after this collapse, and the difference between atheism and nihilism should become clear.

After the fall of the atheist sub-aeon, materialism has started to become oppressive: reasoning has lost its transcendent anchor and has degenerated into mere babbling; people feel increasingly lost, lacking direction, except for that kind of "direction" offered by TV screens, smartphones, advertising, materialist attainments of various kinds. A sense of magic - i.e. "energy" - has become infused into the hitherto solid matter, and the Newtonian vision of a mechanistic universe has been completely undermined. Environmental destruction is rampant, since the here and now of material enjoyment and comfort is the only value that now commands any real respect.

Carroll claims (somewhat before his time; the book was published in 1992!) that while some people today like to speak of "the return of religion", this is not the case. Rather, it is magic that is making a belated comeback, and just as magic and science (materialism) were conflated in the hegemonic age of transcendentalism, so is magic and religion (transcendentalism) conflated today, united simply by their distinction from the all-encompassing materialism. But in the long run, these two paradigms will part ways: magic is on the way up, transcendence on the way down. The next age will be the "Chaoist" sub-aeon of the "Pandemon" aeon: "Chaoist" because of Carroll's affiliation with Chaos Magic, I assume. Thus we are back to where we started in the Shamanic aeon (Animist sub-aeon): materialism and magic in a practical union with one another, in a world where the Transcendent or the Absolute will be perceived in a similar way to magic a century ago: utterly and completely unbelievable. Not by everyone of course, but by many.


For a future post, I would like to discuss some of the ways I think signs of an increase in magical thinking are visible, and future prospects for an even greater increase in such thinking, in relation to postmodernist and post-structuralist philosophy.

Saturday, March 16, 2019

Klimatstrejk

Okej, jag erkänner.

Jag var länge skeptisk till det här "Greta Thunberg-spektaklet", eller åtminstone ambivalent: det där kommer inte göra någon skillnad, hon blir bara utnyttjad, det är folk som drar i trådarna, och så vidare. Men efter att ha sett diverse filmklipp och bilder från manifestationer runt om i världen så måste cynikern i mig träda tillbaka och ge alla dessa ungdomar en eloge. Och faktum är, dessa strejker och manifestationer måste sammantaget få en effekt, om inte lagen om orsak och verkan är upphävd vill säga - det kan inte annat än påverka, om än i liten utsträckning, när så många unga går ut och kräver sin rätt till en framtid.


Invänder cynisk Vän av Ordning: "Jaha du, försök hålla sådana där manifestationer i Kina så får du ser vad som händer."

Invänder Thomas Gür (som jag under en period har följt) på Facebook:
Thunberg är varken det första eller det sista barnet som skjuts fram och bärs på axlar i massrörelser som präglas av starka inslag av religiös millenarism och apokalyptisk frälsningshysteri.
Och så lägger han upp en "passande" bild:


https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=2346732998711546&set=a.140680919316776&type=3&theater

Vilken kan tyckas lite orättvist eftersom Greta är en livs levande flicka som sätter sin egen agenda och inte en "barnsymbol" som målats på en kommunistisk propagandaposter. Många av de som inspireras av henne/"bär fram" henne är också barn/ungdomar. Ironiskt nog så innebär i alla fall Gürs perspektiv att han sållar sig till dem som jämför Greta med Jeanne d'Arc, så i konsekvensens namn kanske han borde ta avstånd från hennes rörelse också...

Visst visst, jag raljerar. Men är det inte alltid ungdomarnas roll att våga drömma om förändring?

Friday, March 15, 2019

The Transcendental Paradigm: Its Downward Trajectory

One of the many reasons why modern academia is boring is that I cannot, for instance, while studying History of Religions, employ as a source a man who is not formally trained as a History scholar, even if he has developed a theoretical framework which could be very useful as a tool for working Historians of Religion. In this case, I am thinking of Peter J. Carroll, a modern occultist who in the book Liber Kaos presents a tripartite scheme for understanding the unfolding of human history. He claims that the "psychohistory" of mankind goes through stages based on the successive growing and diminishing in strength of three fundamental paradigms: the transcendental, materialist and magical paradigms. So in ancient "shamanistic" times, Man lived in the now, the world was full of spirits and he employed magic for material benefit, while the transcendental reality was unknown or not cared about. Eventually, the materialist paradigm retreated in favour of the transcendental one, and a new balance was reached between magical and religious paradigms, while the materialist paradigm retreated, and so on. There is much that can be said about this model - it if of course not something that can be proven as a fact, rather it is only intended to make sense of things and to predict future trends. The funny thing is that academics also develop such models, yet I am willing to bet quite a large sum that the psychohistory model would be greeted with disinterest or even scorn among a large section of academics, granted that its author is a "chaos magician" who does not hold any relevant academic degree.



I am bringing up all of this because I was just now reminded of how the transcendental paradigm is collapsing all around us - slowly, and silently, but nevertheless brutally. This is perhaps no evil in and of itself, it depends on your inclinations, but for people of a spiritual bent, it is bewildering, alienating and depressing. The reminder in question is a section from the website renaissanceastrology.com, where the author Christopher Warnock explains the differences between traditional and modern Western astrology:
The public and even many astrologers are unaware that there is any difference between modern and traditional astrology. But even more than the significant difference in technique and methodology, what really distinguishes modern astrology from traditional astrology are their widely variant worldviews. Traditional astrology follows the traditional worldview, where not only does the spiritual exist, but it is primary over the material. Traditional Hermetic and Neo-platonic philosophy sees the entire Cosmos as One unified being connected by bonds of spiritual sympathy and influence and everywhere embued with pattern and meaning.
Moderns, either consciously or unconsciously either accept or are highly influenced by the modern atheistic/materialist worldview, when inevitably tends to nihilism. The modern worldview is that only matter and energy exist and thus the spiritual is non-existent. Events are random, except when caused by material or energetic causes or direct human intervention and existence is meaningless except for meaning humans choose to put on it which is subjective and conventional. Even those that state that they believe in the spiritual tend to see it operating in a materialist and mechanistic way, e.g. spiritual fields, beams or rays, or look to materialist and energetic causes to explain astrology.
The last meaning is significant: even those who are "spiritual" in fact confuse the spiritual with "energy" and psychic phenomena. And as Carroll predicts, we are now in the nihilistic phase of psychohistory, where magic and religion (i. e. the magical and transcendental paradigms) are frequently confused and bundled together under the rubric of religion; they will soon part ways though, because magic is on the rise and the transcendental paradigm is spiralling downwards.

Regardless of whether one feels more at home with one paradigm or the other, I believe this model is so fundamental in what it captures that its complete lack of publicism is just a little bit weird according to my own highly subjective viewpoint. The trinity of Transcendence, Magic and Matter is fundamentally the same as the Christian trinity of the Father, the Holy Ghost and the Son. It is the same as the more secular partition of Consciousness, Energy and Matter, with the caveat that Consciousness is frequently not seen as fundamentally real, but as a byproduct of the brain (Energy and Matter again). Finally, it is also very similar to the three attributes of existence in Sankhya philosophy: Sattva, Rajas and Tamas. For those unfamiliar with this, it is one of the core teachings of Krishna in the Bhagavad Gita and building block for traditional Hindu philosphies and worldviews. (Roughly speaking, Sattva represents purity and light, Rajas is activity and passion, Tamas is darkness and inertia. I cannot claim that Sattva corresponds exactly to consciousness, that would be the Purusha; nevertheless it is pretty close.)

Suffice to say, these observations do nothing to reimburse my wallet. Now off to work!